But if I go with 2 hard drives, I lose physical desk space, I also lose 1 USB port and I also lose some money up front on a per byte basis since I am buying 2 smaller hard drives instead of 1 big hard drive. On the other hand, If I go with 2 hard drives.I can be assured that I can be safe guarded against at least 1 hard drive failure and still have another one as a backup. But if I go with 1 hard drive, the possibility of a hard drive failure or corruption on any partition could render the whole drive useless and therefore make me lose everything since I.'put all my eggs in one basket'.so to speak. And I can also save some money up front since larger drives seem to be more economical on a per byte basis. On one hand, If I go with just 1 hard drive.I can save physical desk space. One dedicated for time machine backups and one dedicated for storage.īoth options seem to have their own set of advantages and disadvantages and its kind of confusing. One large hard drive that has 2 partitions, one for time machine backups and one for storage. I am kind of confused and I really don't know what my options are and the best practices for achieving a minimal and efficient system. On the other hand, I also need an external hard drive for time machine backups. I need an external hard drive for storage of data.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |